Tripped!

This may be the first time in contemporary literary history in which a poet rhymed “George Steiner” and “vagina”! When we asked David Lehman to write against the Steiner-on-LSD theme, we didn’t know the he had studied in Cambridge. And had taken acid there. And had heard Dr. Steiner lecture on “Language and Silence,” which is, of course, the title of one of his best books. Sometimes things just line up perfectly for QuickMuse… and this is one of those times. A First for DL!

Dig the Thylias Moss Beat

Here’s something you don’t see every day, poetry fans: Thylias Moss rewrites the New York Times’ obituary for the late and extremely great Bo Diddley. All we can say is ba domp domp.

 

 

Schullllltz!

At JBooks.com, the website I edit when I’m not working on QuickMuse, we know from Philip Schultz — and have for some time. (See this review, and this one.) So it was a great surprise to watch as Schultz was given this year’s Pulitzer Prize for poetry. Even more surprising, Schultz took time out of his extremely busy schedule to do a terrific one-man agon.

What else? Our pals at Found Magazine were good enough to help out with Schultz’s theme. Thanks, guys.

An ad hoc Matlock

“When the puzzle piece snaps in,
it’s like ziplock, an ad hoc Matlock.”

Ladies and gentlemen, stop what you’re doing and read the superbly unpremeditated poetry stylings of Matthea Harvey. An ad hoc Matlock!  

Oh, Baby

Mary Jo Bang overhears a baby-monitor conversation and cooks up soothing non-nursery rhymes:

 

 

The baby grew up. Became an almost three-five.
She denunciated the keepers
Of the albums where her brother was pointing
To some flippant toy, and a copy
Of Henry James pointing to little Edith Wharton.
His face as smug as a rug.
Both of them clueless.

Harold Bloom, Poetry, and Jazz

Some fascinating stuff here linking Sonny Rollins, Hart Crane, Bud Powell, and Walt Whitman.  

California Complex

So I published an essay, in Poets & Writers, about the TV show Californication. And about how many non-Californian writers view the Golden State. Let me know what you think.

 

California Complex
By Ken Gordon

Why was Californication, the Showtime series that debuted last August starring David Duchovny as an author who moves from New York City to California after optioning his best-selling novel, renewed for a second season? Surely literate grown-ups, the show’s target audience, have better things to do with their free time, and yet they kept tuning in. Why? 

Were they that happy to see Duchovny break out of his post–X Files muddle or just titillated by Californication’s sex-heavy pilot? Or did the show’s portrayal of entertainment industry angst, combined with the odd allusion to Nabokov and Flaubert keep them coming back? Certainly the original characters can’t be responsible. Hank Moody, the writer Duchovny plays in the show, is just a stubbly Hollywood cliché (New York novelist sells out and walks around feeling miserable about his writer’s block) with a twist (as a result of selling out, he falls into a rock star’s dream of beautiful women, drugs, and booze).

Perhaps the most addictive thing about Californication is that it lets non–Golden State viewers feel superior to writers like Moody, who are completely hobbled by life on the West Coast. They think they’re watching for the glamour and showbiz decadence, but what keeps them wanting more is how smug the show makes them feel. (”We may have made compromises, we may sometimes feel miserable,” one can almost hear the masses mutter, “but at least we’re not living like Hank Moody.”)

Serious readers and writers have long condescended to California, specifically Los Angeles, the place John Updike called “the capital of organized unreality” in his novel Bech at Bay (Knopf, 1998). The problem isn’t the city’s fabled fruitiness, nuttiness, or phoniness, but the fact that writers have been known to do extremely well out West (notwithstanding the issues at stake in the Writers Guild of America’s decision to strike after their contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers expired last November).

After all, California is where generations of Barton Finks flock to pick up paychecks the size of the Hollywood sign. As novelist and short story writer James Salter once told the Paris Review, “Movie writers…are among the most overpaid people on earth. In a certain sense you would do a movie for nothing, just for the fun of doing it. In addition to that, you are lavishly paid.” (Under the terms of the Writers Guild’s expired contract, the New York Times reported, “the six major film studios must pay a minimum of $106,000 for an original screenplay, while networks must pay at least $20,956 for a teleplay or a prime-time comedy show and $30,823 for a prime-time drama.”)

The truth is, Californication’s hackneyed view of California—surprise, surprise—isn’t true. The state isn’t made up entirely of malcontent sellouts. Take, for example, Los Angeles–born, Sacramento resident William T. Vollmann, whose new nonfiction book Riding to Everywhere, in which he chronicles life on the rails as a twenty-first-century dharma bum, is being published this month by Ecco. They don’t make writers more serious, literary, or Californian than Vollmann, who won the 2005 National Book Award for his novel Europe Central (Viking).

David Mamet recently relocated from Massachusetts to Los Angeles, and is no less a genius for it. The West Coast has failed to damage the talents of either Robert Hass, winner of the 2007 National Book Award in poetry for Time and Materials (Ecco), or Michael Chabon (who did some screenwriting on Spider-Man 2). Joan Didion, a sometime screenwriter herself, has produced brilliant work in and about California. And Charles Bukowski, whatever else can be said about him, stayed remarkably true to himself, even in Hollywood. To show their appreciation, a group of fans banded together last summer to declare Bukowski’s East Hollywood bungalow—where he met his publisher, John Martin of Black Sparrow Press—a historic monument. (Bukowski fans should note that “Hank” is the name their author often employed for his autobiographical characters.)

Compare Hank Moody to Richard Lange, a fiction writer in Los Angeles whose recent collection, Dead Boys, was published by Little, Brown last August. Lange writes subtle, realistic stories about people who live in Southern California: a salesman traumatized by the rape of his sister; a likeable middle-class bank robber; a failed, alcoholic actor who grows up while drying out at his mother’s house. These stories don’t make readers feel superior to the characters; they convey the truth that actual human beings live in the City of Angels.

Better yet, consider T. C. Boyle, who has been teaching at the University of Southern California since 1978 and has produced an important—and hefty—shelf of fiction. He survived the adaptation of his book The Road to Wellville (Viking, 1993) into the Alan Parker film of the same title, and Fox nearly made a group of his stories into a television series, with Boyle as a host. “They put Anthony Hopkins and Bridget Fonda on the cover of The Road to Wellville,” Boyle said in an interview with Robert Birnbaum in 2003. “And I resent that. To a degree. But it sold lots and lots of copies.”

In California, there’s no question that authors are less powerful than actors, directors, producers, and even screenwriters. In her essay collection Married to the Icepick Killer (Random House, 2002), Carol Muske-Dukes, whose first novel, Dear Digby (Viking, 1989), was nearly made into a movie starring Michelle Pfeiffer and whose late husband, David Dukes, was a successful actor, writes about living in the same neighborhood as not just Ellen DeGeneres and her then-girlfriend Anne Heche, but the man who voiced Carlton the Doorman on Rhoda. Think, for a moment, about what living in such a neighborhood might mean to a serious literary artist. (”Maybe screenwriting’s not such a bad gig. Maybe I should try to write a more commercial novel—I’ve got bills to pay!”)

Most writers hope for fame and money, but what happens when you produce serious work among neighbors who are busy churning out sitcoms for the boob tube and have accumulated considerably more of both as a result? What’s it like to keep up with Carlton the Doorman?

Perhaps the success of Californication says something about how literary people simply feel beaten by the influence and power of television. Of course, Hank Moody isn’t a real writer, in any sense of the word. His life is just a fantasy grounded in longing and envy—something to distract us from the fact that, wherever we live, most of us will never even have the chance to sell out to Hollywood.

Mary Jo Salter Finds the Implicit in Simplicity

Hey, remember when the NewsHour featured Mary Jo Salter and Brad Leithauser improvising a few love poems? Well, the couple is back. In this poem, Mary Jo is knocked flat by her daughter Hilary’s linguistic arithmetic.  

Brad Leithauser’s Missing Sun

Once in a while, the Poematic freezes up — and the other day it froze on Brad Leithauser. So he took another shot and turned out a poem about missing the sun. When you get a moment, bask in the warmth and light of Leithauser’s words. You’ll be glad you did.

Work With Famous Poets

Checking my Gmail account this morning, I noticed, to the right of my messages, a blue-lettered note in the “sponsored links” column with the message “Work With Famous Poets.”

My first thought came in the voice of Tom Waits: “You must be reading my mail!” My second: “Damn, those Google people are crafty.” Their free email program is so good and fast and reliable that you don’t even notice that it’s keeping track of the topics in your in-box. Now, I might take the time to yak about how Google programmers are using computer intelligence to perform a sort of improvisatory act — there’s surely a kind of art in those data-scanning algorithms — but I’d rather look at the headline ”Work With Famous Poets.” That’s some headline.  

The ad, it turned out, is for a creative-writing workshop in the middle of nowhere with a gaggle of writers I’d never heard of, and one semi-famous person. But it wasn’t the ad as much as the notion that in paying for a workshop you were “working with” these “famous” poets. (We don’t need to talk about the idea that “famous” poets are, for the most part, only famous to other poets, do we? Good. Thank God.) The word “work” implies a relationship of equals. You work with colleagues or clients. The idea here is that you slap down a little bit of money and, bam, suddenly you’ve been promoted. You’re working with famous poets. Simple as that. My sense is that the truth-in-advertising squad would prefer “Study With Famous Poets,” though I know certain writers who think that even “study” is too kind a term to be accurate.

Anyhow: I have to give the person who penned that headline some credit. He or she may not have a future in poetry, but there may be a copywriting career available for the taking.